What is the methodology known as for friction ridge identification?

The methodology known for friction ridge identification is ACE-V, which stands for Analysis, Comparison, Evaluation, and Verification. This systematic approach is crucial for ensuring that latent prints are accurately identified and compared to known prints.

In the Analysis phase, the latent print is examined to determine its quality and the level of detail present. Next, during the Comparison phase, the latent print is compared with a known print to identify patterns, ridge endings, bifurcations, and other unique characteristics. The Evaluation phase involves reaching a conclusion based on the analysis and comparison, where the examiner determines whether the prints match, do not match, or if further analysis is needed. Finally, the Verification phase includes an independent review conducted by another qualified examiner to confirm the findings, ensuring objectivity and accuracy in the identification process.

This methodology is widely recognized in forensics and provides a structured approach to print comparison that emphasizes thoroughness and scientific rigor, making it the standard practice in friction ridge analysis. Other methodologies listed, while they may include valid techniques or assessments related to friction ridges, do not provide the comprehensive framework for identification that ACE-V does.